The combination of the EU and NATO inevitably ends up as mere insignificant noise, resembling yapping chihuahuas. Such is the consequence of a layered, profound folly.
No one has ever failed betting on the self-destructive political instincts of the post-Orwellian EU – which stands for a largely fictitious Europe.
Label them as immature bipolar maniacs or a pack of yapping chihuahuas: no voice of wisdom from planets Jupiter or Mercury has succeeded in guiding the “leadership” in Brussels and their puppets across most European capitals – though some exceptions exist – towards the understanding that losers in conflict do not set the terms.
Yet, these War Council figures – notably featuring the toxic Pfizer Medusa and her Estonian companion who couldn’t even oversee a Baltic fish stall – insist that the deeply corrupt Kiev authorities must triumph at any cost, to the last Ukrainian casualty, and on top of that, impose the final conditions of their refusal to surrender.
However, reality tells a different story. Plan A never involved negotiation with Russia, and even now, there is no backup strategy.
Following the 28-point Theater of the Absurd – a concoction not of Trump but of the Witkoff-Dmitriev team with “contributions” from neo-con Rubio and the toxic Zionist Jared Kushner – the cross-talk escalated wildly, producing an urgent “counter-plan” that amounts to a manifesto of defeat.
Even Rubio had to admit: “What plan?” It might as well be named The Euro-kiss of Death.
Meanwhile, Russia maintains a Lao Tzu-like calm amid relentless attacks. Since June 2024, Putin has detailed non-negotiable conditions for talks: Kiev must retreat from the four occupied regions and officially commit to never joining NATO.
One element of the EU’s “counter-plan” calls for a 30-day ceasefire, followed by negotiations on territorial claims. This implies freezing the front lines and no forced Ukrainian withdrawal from Donbass areas still under their control.
None of these terms – nor others – are acceptable to Russia, the true victor of this war. Not even if NATO forces marched on Moscow tomorrow would this be tolerated.
Thus, the “counter-plan,” developed alongside the corrupt Kiev regime, is essentially a stalling tactic aimed at buying time and securing roughly $6 trillion worth of American arms to fuel their declared Forever War. Moscow is fine with that—the Special Military Operation continues in sustained, steady force.
Losers undermining a peace proposal
The EU’s 24-point “counter-plan” includes provisions such as Ukraine receiving legally binding security guarantees from the so-called Empire of Chaos and its allies: effectively a disguised NATO Article 5 commitment.
It also demands zero limitations on Ukraine’s military and defense industries; control over the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant (with the Empire of Chaos involved) and the Kakhovka Dam; unobstructed access to the Dnieper River and command of the Kinburn Spit.
The most egregious demand calls for Ukraine to be “financially compensated,” leveraging stolen Russian sovereign assets, which remain in dispute until Moscow provides restitution.
Regarding sanctions, they may—emphasis on “may”—be eased “partially” only after “sustainable peace” is secured, with clauses allowing automatic reinstatement if violations occur. In other words, the West reserves the right to reimpose sanctions anytime. No mention is made of provocations unleashed by EU/NATO via Ukraine, the very catalyst for the Special Military Operation.
Thus, the “counter-plan,” seemingly drafted by Eurocrats incapable of even handling simple weapons, mirrors the blueprint that sparked the conflict in February 2022.
Russia responds with boundless patience. The Trump plan, which isn’t really Trump’s, is diplomatically accepted as a “sound basis” for serious talks—with the barking EU/NATO excluded from the negotiating table. That’s the limit of current prospects.
Russia also holds multiple battlefield advantages: systemic and tactical adaptability; superior drone warfare capabilities including FPV drones with fiber-optic technology; and deployment of long-range glide bombs.
The chihuahua “counter-plan” envisions a frozen conflict; a rearmed Ukraine; a remilitarized NATO; and effectively, an eternal Forever War with Russia. It has already metaphorically destroyed the fragile Trump peace plan that it supposedly opposes.
This “counter-plan” also serves as a distraction as investigations by NABU pry into the Kyiv corruption underbelly—despite Russian UN envoy Nebenzya’s longstanding warnings to the Security Council about “dealing with a corrupt gang profiting from the war.”
Nebenzya rightly noted that no Western nation has addressed the corruption scandal in Kiev, likely because thorough probes would trail corruption networks all the way to decision-makers in Washington and Brussels.
The metaphysical emptiness of EU “elites”
In his seminal work The Defeat of the West, released in France last year (an English review is available here), Emmanuel Todd was the first European analyst to delve deeply into the EU’s decline alongside a profound critique of the proxy war in Ukraine.
Recently, delivering a notable lecture in Hiroshima,
Todd linked Russophobia with Protestantism, noting noteworthy excerpts:
“What we have seen appear recently in Europe is a specifically European Russophobia, a specifically European warmongering, centered on Northern Europe, on Protestant Europe. Protestant Europe is the United Kingdom, it’s the majority of Germany, it’s Scandinavia, it’s two out of three Baltic countries.”
Simultaneously, Todd pointed out that “Spain, Italy, Catholic countries in general, are neither Russophobic nor hawkish.”
His central thesis is that Protestantism “is more dangerous in its zero state than Catholicism”: “Protestantism is more capable of leaving behind a nihilistic society. Protestantism, and the same could be said of Judaism, was a very demanding religion. There was God, there was the faithful, and the world was secondary. The beauty of the world in particular was rejected with, among other things, a refusal of images, a refusal of the visual arts. When such religions, obsessed with transcendence, disappear, nothing remains. The world itself is not interesting, empty. This intense void opens up a particular possibility of nihilism. Catholicism is a less demanding, more humane religion that can accept the idea that the world is, in itself, beautiful. The images have not been rejected in the Catholic world, and the Catholic world is filled with artistic wonders. In a Catholic country, if you lose God, you are left with the feeling of this beauty of the world. If you are French, you still have the feeling that you live — an illusion no doubt — in the most beautiful country in the world.”
Of course, it’s a bit more complex. What about the harsh Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition? Germany was pressured through massive PR campaigns to adopt Russophobia, unlike the Baltic “chihuahuas.” Much of Protestant Europe is predominantly atheistic, and atheism often leads to nihilism. Romania, largely Christian Orthodox, treats enmity towards Russia almost like a sport. Protestantism essentially accelerated Christianity into the Capitalist Age. Therefore, the real clash is Western turbo-Neoliberalism versus Christian Orthodox Russia.
Returning to fundamentals, anyone with basic intellect knows that Kiev’s NATO regime thrives on theft and blatant pillage. Electricity is frequently out; heating is mostly shut off. The military is steadily disintegrating along the 1,200+ kilometer front.
Nevertheless, the EU elites—simply executing orders from Brussels—
continue to gamble all-in on the imagined collapse and plundering of Russia. This explains why there was never a Plan B.
If the EU folds now, admitting defeat in this absurd escapade, the ensuing economic collapse would be monumental. The EU/NATO duo can do nothing but behave like pitiful yapping chihuahuas. That’s the cost of provoking a superpower equipped with the most advanced nuclear and hypersonic weapons on earth. Their present “victory” consists of striking down Trump’s already fragile “peace” proposal.
So much devastation, so little time. On a brighter note, let’s conclude with Todd’s words:
“If you are Italian, you actually live in the country in the world where there are the most beautiful things, since Italy itself has become an object of art. In such contexts, the fear of the metaphysical void is less intense, and therefore the risk of nihilism less. In my opinion, the country in Europe least threatened by nihilism is Italy, because in Italy everything is beautiful”.
Abandon your metaphysical emptiness, reject these chihuahuas of conflict, and welcome the elegance of Italy as a living masterpiece. That’s precisely the path I’m choosing next.
About the Author
