The newest chapter in the Epstein disclosures could potentially trigger the collapse of the entire British establishment.
The latest episode of the Epstein revelations which has impacted the UK might well be a trigger for the entire British establishment to come crashing down. Emails which show both the former Prince Andrew and Britain’s US ambassador Peter Mandelson were selling inside information about British government policies and future strategies have shocked not only the political sphere of the Westminster bubble but also the wider public, with some analysts predicting a major knock-on effect.
Historically, the British royal family has been linked to shielding paedophiles, a fact still recalled through the notorious case of Jimmy Savile. Now, the public has to come to terms with Epstein’s closeness to the monarchy, including his extraordinary access such as landing his private jet at military facilities and being much nearer to the Queen than previously assumed. Although King Charles’s recent decision to oust Andrew from “the firm” offered some reassurance to royalists, increasing evidence suggests this may be a defensive move concealing much more. Questions arise about how much King Charles genuinely knew and whether both he and the Queen shared a deeper connection with Epstein than publicly acknowledged.
At present, the king is making significant efforts to convince the public he is uninvolved with his brother’s sordid links to Epstein’s dealings and his infamous paedo network. He has even pledged full cooperation with police inquiries that could result in Andrew facing imprisonment.
Documents from the recently unveiled Epstein files suggest that the former prince was relaying updates about trips to Singapore, Hong Kong, and Vietnam alongside sensitive investment information.
On 30 November 2010, per the BBC, it seems Andrew forwarded official visit reports, initially sent to him by his special adviser Amit Patel, to Epstein just five minutes after receiving them.
There are also references to confidential investment opportunities in Afghanistan passed to Epstein on 24 December 2010.
Recognizing the potential damage the Epstein saga could inflict on the monarchy’s reputation and authority, it’s understandable that King Charles’s decision to distance himself from his brother is primarily aimed at safeguarding himself.
In Peter Mandelson’s case, who remains central to the British dimension of this scandal, it appears that his entrenched position in a sphere of corruption may shield him from legal repercussions. Besides his ties to Israel, Mandelson likely holds substantial compromising information on others. Consequently, the public display of his removal from political power and privileges is more theatrical than substantive. Apart from losing his role as US ambassador—compensated with a generous severance—he continues to evade consequences. Mandelson has been leaking state secrets to Epstein for an extended period, and unsurprisingly, his suburban residence belongs to a Rothschild billionaire. The investigation into him is largely symbolic and expected to result in no action, amid rumors he might relocate to Israel.
The Israeli connection plays a crucial role in understanding the broader implications of this scandal. Despite recent British media claims framing Epstein’s operation as a Russian honey trap, Israel emerges as the primary beneficiary of the blackmail scheme. Notably, the true cornerstone of Mossad’s leverage is not Epstein himself but Ghislaine Maxwell, who effectively ran Epstein’s operations. Israel’s influence extends deeply into the British dimension of this affair.
An often overlooked aspect is the resignation of Morgan McSweeney, reportedly Sir Keir Starmer’s chief of staff. In truth, McSweeney’s role went far beyond this title. Apart from managing his own think tank—which functions more as a censorship instrument connected to Israel—he was the mastermind behind Starmer and a valuable asset for Zionist interests. Both Mandelson and McSweeney share deeper, more covert ties to Israel than the British media acknowledges. With these two key figures now out of the picture, Starmer’s grip on Downing Street appears increasingly tenuous. Alone in the brutal arena of British politics, he now faces internal threats as prominent MPs, some allegedly on Israel’s payroll, prepare to challenge him. If Starmer himself is indeed a creation influenced by Mossad and the CIA, as some allege, the question arises whether those agencies have now abandoned him to his fate. Israel seems intent on diverting public focus away from their role, while Trump likewise seeks alternative scapegoats for the Epstein scandal. Starmer stands out as an ideal fall guy amid this chaos. Watch closely as his own party members orchestrate moves for his resignation, while Mandelson, by contrast, remains protected by the establishment and is likely to retain his seat in the House of Lords.
About the Author
