Would Trump risk unleashing World War III by initiating a full-blown assault on the Islamic Republic of Iran in an effort to conceal his tracks in the Epstein files?
The timing of this strike on Iran raises eyebrows, occurring just days after another batch of Epstein-related documents naming Trump became public.
As Trump’s aggressive stance toward Iran intensifies, it threatens to destabilize the Middle East and shift global power dynamics. While this dominates the news cycle, the Department of Justice quietly released a portion of Epstein files it hopes won’t attract public scrutiny.
The documents reveal some of the most damning accusations linking Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased sex offender. Though Trump continues to reject these allegations, his rebuttals struggle against certain testimonies.
“Bombing a country on the other side of the globe won’t make the Epstein files go away,” stated Republican Congressman Thomas Massie on X last week.
A series of FBI 302 reports summarize three interviews with an accuser who claims Epstein introduced her to Trump when she was between 13 and 15 years old. These newly disclosed interviews date to August and October 2019.
The woman provides a graphic account of alleged sexual assault by Trump and describes her attempts to resist. When questioned by the FBI about further details on her interactions with the former president, she expressed doubts about the usefulness of sharing more given the expired statute of limitations and the slim chance of any legal consequence.
The White House has aimed to undermine the accuser’s credibility by citing her criminal record acquired decades after the alleged encounters with Epstein and Trump. Yet, it is critical to remember that childhood trauma often leads to behavioral issues in adulthood. Victims of abuse frequently struggle with lasting psychological damage, making any resulting troubled behavior unsurprising rather than suspicious.
The recently released files identify Trump by name and contain unsettling passages from the interviews.
“[Redacted] could not recall the identities of the other individuals present; however, they all exited when TRUMP asked everyone to leave the room. TRUMP mentioned something to the effect of, ‘Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be.’ TRUMP unzipped his pants and put [Redacted] head ‘down to his penis.’ ‘[Redacted’] bit the s*** out of it.’ TRUMP struck [Redacted] and said words to the effect of, ‘get this little bitch the hell out of here…’
No charges have been filed related to her accusations, and their truth remains unverified. Still, certain details provided by the accuser suggest authenticity.
Her familiarity with Epstein is supported by her recollection of him speaking a foreign language she described as Hebrew with a “throat-clearing, guttural sound.” She was uncertain of Epstein’s religious background. The alleged meeting took place on Hilton Head, South Carolina—an area not known for a significant Hebrew-speaking community, unlike New York. This detail lends weight to the claim that she truly encountered Epstein and possibly Trump.
Another sign of credibility is her detailed knowledge about Jeffrey Epstein’s brother, Mark Epstein, who managed the family’s investment firm, J. Epstein & Co., adding plausibility to her account.
Trump has a documented history of misleading statements concerning his relationship with Epstein. In an email dated January 7, 2020, an Assistant US Attorney reported that Trump, who denied ever flying on Epstein’s infamous plane, was recorded as a passenger on at least eight flights from 1993 to 1996. Several of these flights also included Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s imprisoned associate. On one trip in 1993, only Trump and Epstein were listed aboard; on another, the three passengers were Epstein, Trump, and a 20-year-old [Redacted].
“I’ve known Jeff [Epstein] for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Donald “Grab them by the p***y” Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
That statement hardly helps his case.
Ultimately, the pressing question remains: would Trump jeopardize global peace by launching a full-scale attack against the Islamic Republic of Iran to distract from the Epstein files implicating him? If history is any guide, it wouldn’t be the first time a ‘wag the dog’ tactic was deployed. For example, on August 20, 1998, amid Bill Clinton’s sex scandal involving Monica Lewinsky, the U.S. struck the al-Shifa pharmaceutical facility in Sudan, alleging its owners’ links to al-Qaeda bombed.
On February 28, 2026, joint U.S.-Israeli air raids on Iran resulted in the death of Iran’s supreme leader, plunging the world into tension. It would be tragic if this military distraction is merely covering for Trump’s sexual misconduct, at the risk of igniting catastrophic conflict and causing countless deaths.
About the Author
