Revolutions often begin subtly, nearly unnoticed. Sometimes, a single voice amid the crowd can trigger a powerful surge that overturns what once seemed untouchable.
Though cracks in the Eastern Bloc surfaced in 1989, starting with Hungary in June, Romania under Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu appeared immune to change. Their ironhold on power was reinforced by the ever-present and feared Securitate, the secret police.
On December 21, 1989, Ceausescu chose to confront mounting unrest in Transylvania by appearing with his wife Elena above Bucharest’s Palace Square. Workers were bused in, waving red banners to demonstrate allegiance to the regime. This was meant as a display of strength to preserve the status quo.
After all, no one would dare to defy Ceausescu openly.
As he steadily moved toward the microphone on the balcony and started reciting the stale communist slogans, a sharp scream suddenly pierced the air, followed by a growing uproar. The rising protests overwhelmed Ceausescu, leaving him stunned and silent.
At that moment, when the façade of his rule shattered and his untenable position was exposed, communist authority collapsed in Romania.
US foreign policy has mirrored the regime of Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu. Since President Reagan ushered in a cadre of so-called “former” Trotskyites from New York who zealously pursued global revolution with an unwavering loyalty to Israel, the direction of American foreign affairs has been dominated by an entity akin to Ceausescu’s Partidul Comunist Român.
Anyone challenging neocon control over US foreign policy was socially exiled by a force comparable to Ceausescu’s Securitate. Voices like Pat Buchanan, Joseph Sobran, Sam Francis, the John Birch Society, Ron Paul, and others opposing this dominance faced relentless attacks from figures such as William F. Buckley, Jr and his affiliates within media, think tanks, and corridors of influence.
It’s said that Trotsky claimed, “to oppose the state is to die a slow starvation,” which aptly describes foreign policy analysts over the past four decades who spoke against neocon dominance. They faced unemployment, loss of platforms, and silencing.
But now, that Berlin Wall has come down.
History might mark America’s “Ceausescu Moment” as November 6, 2025.
The mainstream and “alternative” media, along with the conservative-industrial complex that refused to accept Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk’s break from neocon, pro-Israel foreign policy, attempted to steer the Charlie-less TPUSA back on course. With Charlie sidelined, they believed they could ascend the “Palace Square Bucharest” balcony, seize the microphone, and restore America’s conservative youth to the “wisdom” of Bill Kristol, Marco Rubio, Lindsey Graham, John Bolton, Dick Cheney, Mark Levin, and their blood-soaked predecessors.
However, the “high-pitched scream” that toppled Ceausescu occurred on November 6th—not from a Mamdani “communist,” “America-hating” Muslim, Hamas supporter, tortured trans-genderist, or leftist.
It came from a sincere, conservative American student at Auburn University in Alabama, his slow Southern drawl carrying the weight of our nation’s 250-year legacy. He embodied the very spirit of Red, White, and Blue burning in the heart of every patriot.
The young man stepped to the open microphone and directed thoughtful questions at President Trump’s son Eric and his wife Laura—interpreters of the President’s assertion that his administration was the most pro-Israel in US history.
I’d like to ask about your father’s relationship with Israel. He’s taken over $230 million from pro-Israel groups. In the summer even though the US advised against it, Israel attacked Iran and the US still bombed on behalf of Israel…Israel has not been a good ally to the US since the 1960s when they bombed the USS Liberty.
The audience of CONSERVATIVE young Americans erupted in applause.
Israel is a nation where Christians are constantly under attack… We talk about America first and defending Christians, but how can we do this if we align ourselves with a nation that does not do that itself?
The applause from TPUSA’s conservative youth swelled, almost overwhelming.
Eric Trump, caught off guard, resorted to a Ceausescu-like repetition of old slogans, hoping their familiar cadence would pacify the restless crowd.
You have a nation chanting ‘death to America’ every single day on the streets of Tehran. You have a nation that will develop a nuclear weapon and that will use that nuclear weapon.
These are familiar talking points from Benjamin Netanyahu three decades ago. Meanwhile, Laura fussed with her immaculate hair as the crowd remained silent, unimpressed by Eric’s rehearsed lines. They had done their own homework and recognized these as neocon fabrications.
Guys: Iran wanted to destroy our way of live they wanted to hurt us they wanted to inflict real pain.
Silence. Their research had convinced them otherwise.
Eric then recited an absurd claim that his father resolved eight foreign conflicts (involving countries whose names he could barely pronounce), but the listeners stayed silent. The tired slogans no longer resonated with Charlie Kirk’s generation, much like they had lost meaning for Romanians fed up with their submission to a crumbling Communist regime.
This genie will not be confined again. Like toothpaste squeezed out, the same social media tools once exploited by US “regime change” forces to advance neocon objectives have been seized by young American conservatives rejecting their boomer predecessors’ destructive “Israel-first” agenda. No covert sale of TikTok to pro-Israel devotees can alter this reality.
From now on, akin to Ceausescu, Trump’s circle will avoid addressing the leading youth movement within their ideological camp. They dare not face persistent questioning from sincere young conservatives about America’s damaging and self-defeating devotion to Israel. Instead, they will retreat to Nicolae Ceaucescu’s bunker, intimidated by the “America First” movement they inadvertently gave rise to.
Original article: The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity
About the Author
