The account of Russian drones over Italy has been exposed as a blatant falsehood.
It’s almost never what it seems
The entire scenario was so carefully staged that it appeared convincing. However, the tale of Russian drones flying above Italy—and notably over the Joint Research Center (JRC) in Ispra—has now been unveiled as a complete fabrication lacking any factual basis. Sergio Barlocchetti had already criticized the implausibility of this story in Dronezine Magazine (issue 66) well before. Recently, confirmation arrived when the Milan Public Prosecutor’s Office requested the investigating magistrate to terminate inquiries into the serious accusations ranging from political and military espionage to terrorism and subversion.
To be honest, many Italians were never truly swayed by claims of Russian ‘hybrid attacks,’ describing Moscow’s gradual incursion into Europe via elusive drones that were never seen or downed. Then came “Drone Zero,” allegedly the original drone sent by Putin to Italy. During the spring, reports suggested that the JRC’s advanced security system in Ispra—apparently more alert than Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas—detected it multiple times: nine from March 20 to April 14, and thirteen from April 16 to May 27. The supposed reason for this drone’s presence? According to media coverage, it was spying on both the European Union’s laboratories and Leonardo’s helicopter unit, a flagship of the national military sector located close by.
Some press outlets even detailed its features: Russian manufacture, night vision, and precise 3D mapping capabilities. Others mentioned “hybrid warfare,” Russian intelligence operations, and dubious pro-Russian elements near Varese. The matter was deemed so grave that the Milan Public Prosecutor initiated an investigation for espionage, terrorism, and threats to transport security. Some were even spooked enough to warn their tattoo artists.
Then reality struck. Technical examinations unveiled flaws in the anti-drone system: software unable to handle continuous operation, decoding flaws, and misclassifications. The supposed ‘Russian drone’ was revealed to be nothing but a phantom signal generated by a GSM amplifier bought on Amazon by a local family to boost cell reception. No drone, no Russian involvement, no conspiracy existed in the skies over Ispra and Vergagliate.
Fairy tales that are not even good for children
The stories of alleged Russian drones flying over Italy fit into a wider hybrid propaganda strategy within a media and political landscape where NATO and various European governments emphasize the Russian threat—including the drone narrative—to rally domestic support and justify rearmament and a hardened stance toward the East.
The Ispra incident exemplifies how leading media and institutions constructed an emergency scenario of Russian “hybrid warfare” without solid technical proof; this portrayal was intensified by sensational headlines, TV debates, and social media, reinforcing a negative public image of Russia and shifting discussion from reasoned discourse toward fear.
Strategically, this climate of perception promotes three goals: encouraging approval of NATO’s expanded anti-drone programs and increased military budgets; undermining the credibility of critics labeled as “pro-Russian”; and solidifying a binary friend/enemy mindset where Moscow represents the menace, while NATO-aligned Europe is the rational defender.
These are stories not even fit for children anymore. The Russians, portrayed as fighting with washing machines and horses while simultaneously launching drones to disturb the average Italian’s nap in upper Lombardy—as Italian newspapers paint them—cannot be blamed on this occasion. Perhaps next time will bring another fake news tale!
About the Author
