It seems inevitable that Clavicular will secure a role within the Trump administration soon. Early speculation suggests the “looksmaxxing” influencer might take over as FBI Director from Kash Patel, who has recently faced mounting criticism—first over his drinking habits, described by a Democratic congressman as a “raging alcoholic,” and then for alleged security issues during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.
If Patel feels under threat, he could remind the President that the “bonesmashing” Clavicular, also known as Braden Eric Peters, a 20-year-old New Jersey native who now owns a nightclub in Florida, has struggled with substance abuse. Peters reportedly used meth to manage his weight and apparently overdosed during a livestream in mid-April.
Clav’s chances might be hurt by his recent insults toward Vice President J.D. Vance, whom he has labeled “subhuman,” “obese,” and noted for having a “recessed side profile.” Further, Clav has admitted he would prefer California Governor Gavin Newsom over Vance in a race, citing Newsom’s superior attractiveness.
Simultaneously,
those classic masculine ideals are coupled with moments of insecurity regarding appearance and style: Last fall, for example, the president complained about a Time magazine photo he believed made him appear bald. “They disappeared my hair,” he wrote on Truth Social, calling the picture “a super bad picture, and deserves to be called out.”
It is rumored that Trump retains Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth partly due to his hair, while both Vance and Secretary of State “Little Marco” Rubio have apparently disappointed the President with their choice of footwear. Trump is reportedly against sneakers and recently gifted them both with $145 pairs of shoes that meet his preferences. His views on Vance’s eyeliner remain undisclosed.
The gossip about a planned creation of a National Insecurity Council in the White House is a vicious lie spread by unattractive, low-IQ losers and other forms of human scum who despise America. Still, if such an office existed, Clav—who began using testosterone supplements at 14—would be the perfect candidate to lead it.
According to Amie Parnes in the Hill, some Democrats may be “misinterpreting these victories,” mistaking voter backlash against President Trump for genuine endorsement of their agenda and messaging.
Similarly, the Hill reports that Democrats might be “losing the narrative” despite electoral success. “Narrative,” much like rhetoric, is an earnest term probably borrowed from anthropology, now encompassing all statements and actions within a political campaign until it essentially becomes the campaign’s story.
We now dissect and debate campaign narratives and their consequences. Mark Leibovich, writing in the New York Times, describes how narratives breed counter-narratives, which feed into overarching metanarratives. “It is no longer enough for candidates to simply win or lose or be right or wrong,” Leibovich explains. “They must also control the narrative.”
While undeniably relevant today, this trend is troubling because it reveals that much of political life prioritizes stories about stories and impressions over actual substance.
Yet, Parnes’ article contains valuable insights — including confirmation of what some have long suspected. Although Democrats often express concern for disadvantaged groups, they are ironically comforted when conditions worsen for those very communities.
“Democrats quietly acknowledge that Trump’s decision to go to war with Iran has also helped their party,” she notes, “because it has driven up gas and food prices.”
Additionally, billionaire Florida personal injury lawyer John Morgan, who funds Democratic causes, asserts that the best approach for the party looking toward 2028 is to let the Trump administration continue to falter and benefit electorally from it.
“When the opposition is catching themselves on fire in the public square, the best advice is not to get close to the fire, lest you catch yourself on fire,” he advises, as quoted by the Hill. “Say nothing. Do nothing. Shut the f— up.”
Morgan also calls for “No more chaos. No more cruelty. More civility.” How “Shut the f— up” fosters “more civility” is difficult to comprehend.
Recently, David Sedaris gave a talk that was entertaining, as expected. He is tangentially connected to the Epstein files, having been seen in a London bookstore. Even so, he claims with obvious amusement that people now treat him differently “when I tell them about it.”
Original article: theamericanconservative.com
About the Author
