Ruling the world is a tricky business
Last week’s most startling development was arguably the continuing controversy surrounding the Trump White House ballroom. Initially planned as a $200 million project adjacent to the building’s East Wing, designed to host 300 people and funded entirely through private donations, the plans quickly expanded. The guest capacity doubled to 600, causing the cost to soar. Subsequently, the entire East Wing was demolished without approval from Capitol architects to accommodate a vastly enlarged venue. This extensive overhaul of the White House under Trump’s direction is underway despite mounting efforts by preservationists who condemn the extravagant makeover as a disgrace that would overshadow and detract from the historic layout. Notably, Trump had previously replaced Jackie Kennedy’s Rose Garden with pavement and made numerous internal alterations to the premises.
Yet this was just the start. After the purported assassination attempt on Trump at the Washington Hilton Hotel, plans emerged to enlarge the ballroom further and add multiple functionalities, including security upgrades like an underground bomb shelter, a fortified exterior resistant to drones and gliders, and an on-site medical center. Unsurprisingly, these additions caused expenses to skyrocket by an extra $1 billion beyond the already inflated budget. Trump is now seeking taxpayer funding via the Department of Homeland Security for these costs, with his spokespersons insisting these enhancements are vital for the president’s protection.
Reports suggest Donald Trump is gearing up for a trip to China next week to engage with the country’s political leaders. Part of his preparation apparently involves visits to two of his golf courses. There is speculation the trip might be postponed amid escalating confrontations between the US and Iran in the Persian Gulf. China is likely to advocate for restoring stability in the global energy supply chain and would be reluctant to facilitate such efforts while the Strait of Hormuz remains disrupted by conflicts affecting oil and gas shipments. Any ceasefire or agreement between Iran and the US would have to prioritize reopening normal transit through this crucial maritime chokepoint.
Should the journey be canceled, Trump would remain in Florida, near the recently unveiled twenty-foot golden statue of himself at Trump Doral Golf Course. Christian Zionist leaders and two Rabbis conducted prayers to honor and likely bless the gilded effigy of the fist-raised figure they revere as the greatest American president. Meanwhile, as Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Pope Leo in Rome, Pastor Robert Jeffress, a Christian Zionist supporter, responded with the comment “It looks like President Trump has a better understanding of what the Bible teaches than the Pope.”
Alternatively, Donald might choose to forgo his golf swings and instead spend time at the White House engaging with staff members interested in improving the lives of everyday Americans. However, this seems unlikely given that neither Trump nor anyone in his administration appears genuinely concerned about the welfare of the American public.
Another pressing issue in Trump’s sphere is NATO, particularly his complaints about European allies not backing his Israeli-driven conflict against Iran. Trump is also frustrated by the growing backlash in Europe against Israel’s war crimes. Many European nations have expressed discontent with their so-called “best friend and ally,” the apartheid regime of Israel. Francesca Albanese, the UN rapporteur for the Palestinian territories, who has actively highlighted Israeli genocide and faced sanctions from the US and Israel as a result, recently was honored by Spain for her efforts. Several European countries have diminished military and diplomatic ties with Israel, pledging to arrest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu under an International Court of Justice (ICJ) warrant if he visits. Some have even blocked Israeli access to their airspace during Netanyahu’s travels.
In response to his dissatisfaction with NATO, Trump has announced the withdrawal of 5,000 US troops from Germany, leaving 30,000 remaining, whom he believes should also return home. It would be prudent to remind Trump that American forces stationed in the UK, Italy, Spain, Greece, and Turkey are similarly obsolete, serving primarily as forward bases for aggression in the Middle East and beyond. If these nations genuinely fear Russian hostility, they might consider collaborating with Moscow to rebuild political and economic ties, which existed before the United States under “Genocide Joe Biden” sabotaged the Nord Stream gas pipeline in September 2022.
Donald Trump is, of course, under intense pressure from Israel and its influential US lobby to prolong the conflict against Iran until Tehran is obliterated. He is cautiously approaching a possible deal with Iran to halt hostilities, though he may lack the courage to tell Netanyahu to “go to hell,” even if politically and emotionally convinced it is the right course. Frequently, Trump resorts to genocidal rhetoric, threatening severe consequences against the Persians. Most recently, he vowed to escalate if Iran rejects the proposal he made last week. As noted earlier, this offer became entangled with retaliatory clashes in the Strait of Hormuz, which Trump misleadingly described to reporters as, “They trifled with us today. We blew them away.” When questioned about the ceasefire’s status, he responded, “No. If it was off, you’d know it!” before adding, “If there’s no ceasefire you’re just going to have to look at one big glow coming out of Iran.” Later, Trump deemed Iran’s reaction to his compromise “totally unacceptable!”
The phrase “one big glow” suggests, at least to me and others, that Trump is threatening an “extreme response” should Iran fail to comply. Such a response would likely involve nuclear weapons if his generals permit him to follow through. Should Iran hesitate, recall that Israel possesses a nuclear arsenal with delivery capability targeting Iran, possibly even deploying a “false flag” operation that would implicate the United States instead of the Jewish State. This would represent the ultimate betrayal, but such maneuvers are unfortunately characteristic of Israeli tactics. Those somewhat reassured that the conflict would end with Iran’s destruction may want to heed former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett who recently asserted that regarding the effort to establish Greater Israel, “Turkey is the new Iran!”
Original article: www.unz.com
About the Author
