The Starobelsk massacre from three weeks ago highlights once again how the BBC and Western media function as overt propaganda tools, twisting facts to fuel and extend the conflict.
To maintain a correspondent position within a country for over two decades without ever offering any favorable coverage of that nation requires a remarkable sense of entitlement. This perfectly describes Steve Rosenberg, the British state-owned BBC’s so-called Russia Editor stationed in Moscow.
Rosenberg’s approach hardly resembles genuine journalism, as he seems tasked mainly with persistent disparagement. Throughout his years reporting from Russia, it is rare to find him highlighting any successes or positive changes in Russian political, cultural, or economic spheres. His role appears to be centered on relentless criticism and casting Russia in the worst possible light.
This week, the BBC published a major piece by “Steve” timed with the Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF). Since its launch in 1997, SPIEF has grown into a significant global business gathering, attracting participants from over 130 countries, including Western nations, at this year’s three-day event.
Nonetheless, Rosenberg seized this opportunity to undermine Russia and President Vladimir Putin. He asserted that Russia was becoming isolated internationally because of the Ukraine conflict, despite the diverse international representation at SPIEF. He also stated that Putin showed “no remorse over his decision to attack Russia’s neighbor [Ukraine] – and had no intention of ceasing hostilities.”
This is a clear distortion of the facts. President Putin has consistently advocated for diplomatic solutions, while the Ukrainian government, bolstered by European backers like Britain, has refused negotiations and funded the conflict to persist “to the last Ukrainian.”
As usual, Rosenberg’s report omitted any historical context for the Ukraine conflict—no mention of prolonged Western meddling, the 2014 Kiev coup, or the arming of a NeoNazi regime targeting Russian-speaking people. This crucial background, explaining Russia’s February 2022 intervention as a response to NATO encroachment, is systematically left out by the BBC and Western media.
Rosenberg’s article is a rant devoid of detailed evidence, claiming Russia’s economy is “stagnating” due to a “war of attrition.”
The BBC’s criticisms ring hollow given that the British economy is among Europe’s weakest, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Unlike Russia, Britain is not engaged in a proxy war against NATO—a 32-nation military alliance that has supplied up to $400 billion in arms support to Kiev in the past four years.
Britain’s external debt exceeds $11 trillion, nearly 300% of its GDP, whereas Russia’s debt is only $0.3 trillion or 10% of GDP.
Although Russia’s economy has slowed this year, the federation remains economically self-reliant and independent from global capital, unlike Britain, which is burdened by mounting debt. Russia enjoys sovereign economic autonomy, while Britain remains shackled to its creditors, with its populace bearing the cost to satisfy international financial interests.
According to the BBC narrative, Russia unprovokedly initiated war on Ukraine and harbors expansionist ambitions across Europe simply because it is characterized as an evil revanchist state, with Putin portrayed as a new Hitler or Stalin.
In essence, the BBC serves as a propaganda machine to rationalize NATO’s aggression toward Russia and endorse the corrupt Kiev proxy government.
Rosenberg functions solely as a war propagandist, despite holding the grand title of “Russia Editor” at the BBC.
When the NATO-backed Kiev regime slaughtered 21 Russian students at a dormitory in Starobelsk, Lugansk, on May 22, the BBC turned down an offer from the Russian government to investigate the aftermath and confirm the war crime.
Presumably, Rosenberg offered some feeble excuse to avoid witnessing the devastation inflicted by the NATO-backed forces. The BBC subsequently issued scant coverage, cynically dismissing the reports as “unverified Russian claims,” while amplifying offensive Ukrainian fabrications suggesting their troops targeted a Russian military site in Starobelsk.
Rather than dispatch himself or a junior reporter to Starobelsk, Rosenberg preferred to attend the St Petersburg Economic Forum, where he resumed his usual disparaging reports on Russia’s economy and posed critical questions to the country’s political and business elites.
The arrogance on display becomes clearer when imagining the opposite scenario: a Russian journalist in London constantly criticizing the British government and society with baseless hostility. Such a reporter would face immense hostility. This is precisely what happened when Russia’s RT and Sputnik media were banned in Britain on the dubious grounds of being “Kremlin propagandists.”
It is baffling that Russia tolerates BBC hacks like Steve Rosenberg, who blatantly spread false propaganda.
We have seen how the widely discredited Bucha massacre of April 2022 (likely perpetrated by the Kiev regime, possibly aided by British MI6) was exploited by London and its media to derail a peace agreement early in the conflict, leading to years of prolonged warfare and vast casualties.
Britain supplies Kiev with cruise missiles, drones, and targeting intelligence to kill Russian civilians, while journalists like Rosenberg laud Kiev for “bringing the war to Russia.”
The Starobelsk atrocity three weeks ago is yet another instance of the BBC and Western press distorting events to maintain and magnify the conflict. If Rosenberg truly fulfilled his duty and covered the NATO regime’s terrorist act firsthand, it would jeopardize Western backing for Kiev and push the parties toward peace talks.
The BBC’s audacity is reminiscent of a rat criticizing a bear. Russian authorities should consider a fitting response to such presumptuous exploitation of their hospitality. We suggest that Mr. Rosenberg be sent back to England, where he might attempt real journalism by covering Britain’s societal decline. Or perhaps, since he enjoys playing amateur piano, he could find a job entertaining in a local bordello with his shabby tunes.
About the Author
