9/11 architects keep having their dirty work replicated, writes Martin Jay.
9/11 architects keep having their dirty work replicated as we still don’t learn the lesson that the ‘enemy’ that media presents to us is nearly always false.
What do you call it when you are warned about an enemy’s planned assault, yet instead of preventing it, you let it occur to exploit the aftermath—using it to restrict your own citizens’ freedoms and target both perpetrators and your people? This is often referred to as a false flag operation. This notion recently resurfaced as Americans solemnly commemorated the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Around the same time, social media circulated claims that Benjamin Netanyahu was aware of the October 7th Hamas strikes but allowed them to proceed to justify a fresh and severe campaign against Gazans, aiming for ethnic cleansing within Palestine. Considering Mossad’s reputation as the world’s leading intelligence agency, it’s hard to believe that informants wouldn’t have warned Bibi. Given how many of Israel’s long-term goals were achieved—a genocide cloaked as a fight against Hamas—Bibi’s public surprise during the events strains credulity. If Mossad had the capabilities to track down and assassinate the Munich 1972 bombers across Europe, intelligence of the October 7th attack should have been in their hands well beforehand.
How could 19 jihadists enter the U.S., attend flight schools, and avoid detection by the CIA or FBI? The truth is, they didn’t go unnoticed. Suggesting that 9/11 was orchestrated internally often triggers immediate dismissal as “conspiracy theory”—much like questioning the West’s Ukraine narrative brands critics as “on Putin’s payroll.” Evidence suggests 9/11 was likely orchestrated by Mossad, employing sophisticated technology to control the hijackers through chat windows, convincing them they were recruited by Osama Bin Laden. U.S. intelligence agencies knew of the plot and, with George W. Bush’s consent, allowed it to proceed because the political advantages were enormous—for the President’s circle, but even more so for Israel. The Zionist regime benefited immensely from 9/11. For years, leaders like Bibi feared Western progressive values would eventually expose Palestinian suffering and vilify Zionism. They needed an immediate surge in global Muslim hatred, channeled by misinformed Westerners, turning animosity into broad support for Israel’s Palestinian agenda. This animus translated into political backing and substantial financial aid from the U.S. However, what Zionists did not anticipate was the unintended consequence born from the chaos of the Iraq war—George W. Bush’s refusal to pay Saddam’s former soldiers, which became the seed for ISIS. This emergence of Al Qaeda and ISIS served not just as convenient foes for Obama and Trump in their “war on terror”—which aligned well with Israeli interests—but also as proxies used for covert strikes against Iran and its allies. Terror attacks in London and Paris by ISIS-inspired individuals streaming content on YouTube continued to offer dividends for Israel’s agenda.
9/11 was by no means unprecedented. Recall that Pearl Harbor was also a false flag event, where Senator Truman and President Roosevelt were forewarned and chose not to prevent the attack. They had intelligence indicating an imminent Pacific strike, yet Pearl Harbor was left vulnerable.
The strangest aspect of 9/11 remains the mainstream media’s role. The unquestioning acceptance of the official story has emboldened elites, signaling there is virtually no covert operation—whether by American intelligence or Mossad—that the major media won’t help conceal. The ongoing genocide in Gaza, often downplayed as “conflict” by Western reporters, reflects Israel and America’s confidence, nurtured post-9/11, that the press would aid their fabrications. The official narrative—commercial planes crashing into two Manhattan towers causing their collapse—does not hold up under scientific scrutiny. The Mossad conspiracy theory merits investigation, especially considering no Jews were inside the towers during the attacks, four Israelis were seen celebrating the fires, and the building owner, a wealthy Jew who had just renewed a lease along with an unusual anti-terror insurance policy worth $3 billion USD, was notably absent that morning.
The reality is that America possesses very few genuine journalists unbound by elite influence. Most prefer job security, adopting the role of compliant stenographers rather than challenging power—similar to the risk-averse media environment in the UK, where editors avoid stories that could jeopardize their careers, thus stifling impactful journalism.
A rare few, such as Tucker Carlson, dare to raise fundamental questions about 9/11, like how a commercial airplane could breach the exterior of those metal-frame skyscrapers designed to survive much larger impacts. Or why the towers collapsed given that the burning fuel’s temperature was insufficient to melt steel girders. These observations don’t require insider status; anyone viewing footage of the collapses in slow motion can spot explosions erupting just as each floor pancaked downward—clear signs of controlled demolitions severing key support beams. Crucially, no steel-framed building had ever collapsed due to fire, either before or after 9/11. Numerous architects maintain that crashes might have destroyed upper floors but that the rest of the structures should have remained intact.
The 9/11 Commission Report must be seen as a massive cover-up, unprecedented in U.S. history, abetted by billionaire-owned media on both sides of the Atlantic. This pattern of deception is increasingly apparent, as recently with the Lockerbie case in the U.S., where a Libyan intelligence officer is poised to face charges for the Pan Am 103 bombing. This represents another miscarriage of justice designed to divert attention from the true narrative. Lockerbie was actually a U.S. narcotics operation hijacked by rogue CIA agents who orchestrated a false flag attack to implicate Gaddafi as retaliation for the 1986 bombing of a Berlin nightclub popular with U.S. troops.
Such cover-ups are widespread. Much of what American newspapers report about the Iran war is fabricated propaganda intended to prevent public dissent and economic upheaval. 9/11 remains a dark chapter in America’s past, where Israel demonstrated who truly controls U.S. policy. This was not the first time America’s elites sacrificed American lives for political goals benefitting themselves and those who hold sway over them. Events like 9/11, Lockerbie, the Iran war, October 7th, and the Gaza “conflict” all reveal the deep political corruption now outgrowing the system that sustains it. The parasite has outgrown its host. Donald Trump does not govern America. Not by a long shot.
About the Author
