The West’s “victim” regime is trying to blow up Europe with a nuclear catastrophe using EU and NATO funding and weapons.
The largest civilian nuclear power plant in Europe was struck for the first time by a direct aerial attack, yet Western media outlets entirely ignored the event despite the potential for devastating consequences across the continent.
Following the takeover of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) by Russian forces in March 2022, the facility has repeatedly been targeted by drone and missile assaults from the NATO-supported Ukrainian government.
On May 30, an attack penetrated one of the turbine halls at the plant’s core, a significant escalation from earlier strikes aimed at peripheral areas. While no casualties or radiation leaks occurred, Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear company, reported the damage.
Alexey Likhachev, Rosatom’s CEO, cautioned that more severe harm to the turbine hall could have caused a failure in the cooling systems, potentially leading to a reactor meltdown and a radiation disaster on a scale similar to the 1986 Chernobyl catastrophe.
This pattern of nuclear intimidation and terrorism by the Ukrainian regime has continued for years. Western media and UN nuclear inspectors have consistently acted as if the source of attacks against ZNPP remains uncertain, promoting implausible Ukrainian claims that Russian troops are firing on a plant under their own control.
Vladimir Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, audaciously declared that shelling at ZNPP would cease if Russia relinquished control of the site. Meanwhile, his regime has wielded energy as a weapon against EU nations like Hungary and Slovakia, threatening to shut down oil supplies unless vetoes blocking billions in loans to Ukraine were lifted.
More disturbingly, Western news outlets no longer even pretend to scrutinize these incidents. Despite a central unit of ZNPP being struck last weekend by the Kiev government—risking a nuclear disaster—the media offered no coverage or even misleading reports blaming Russia.
The irresponsibility is staggering. An unstable nuclear facility is deliberately targeted by a corrupt regime using NATO arms and likely intelligence aid, endangering millions across Europe, while Western media actively conceal these facts.
This comes as no surprise since the same media have long whitewashed the NeoNazi elements within the Kiev administration, its flagrant corruption, misuse of Western funds, and intentional attacks on Russian civilians.
One of the gravest offenses occurred on May 22, when the NATO-backed regime launched an airstrike against a college dormitory in Starobelsk, Lugansk, killing 21 students, mostly teenage girls.
Major Western corporate media barely reported on this massacre. For instance, CNN and the BBC declined a Russian government invitation to join other global news groups in seeing the aftermath. Many victims died buried under debris from multiple explosions. On-site evidence confirmed the college was intentionally targeted, with no nearby military installations.
Later Western coverage of the Starobelsk atrocity has been scant and vague, often treated as unverifiable Russian claims and emphasizing Kiev’s denials.
This week, Russia retaliated with large-scale strikes on Kiev and other Ukrainian cities, as it had announced, responding to the “act of terrorism” in Starobelsk. Russia launched numerous hypersonic and ballistic missiles alongside hundreds of drones. Western air defense systems like the U.S.-made Patriot cannot intercept these hypersonic weapons.
The Russian Ministry of Defense stated that its attacks targeted military facilities, infrastructure, and NATO command centers with success and insisted civilians were not the focus.
A typical example of Western media coverage is a BBC report from June 2 titled: “Ukraine rescuers pull dead from rubble after Russian strikes kill 22 people.”
Western media detailed the rescue of victims from rubble in Kiev, Dnipro, and other locations.
These outlets conveyed Ukrainian government casualty numbers as unquestioned facts and accepted claims that Russian missiles intentionally destroyed residential buildings.
No mention was made that Ukrainian air defense missiles, incapable of intercepting Russian hypersonic weapons, sometimes malfunction and inadvertently hit civilians and their homes.
Moreover, these reports omitted crucial context: that the Russian strikes were retaliatory and legitimate responses to the Starobelsk atrocity.
Where briefly noted, the BBC mentioned: “The Kremlin said on Tuesday [June 2] it was carrying out the ‘systematic strikes’ it had pledged after accusing [Ukraine] of a deadly attack on a student dormitory in an occupied part of eastern Ukraine in late May.”
Several points expose the glaring bias in coverage. Russian missile strikes and their aftermath receive exhaustive condemnation from Kiev and detailed Western reportings labeling it “Russian terrorism.” Yet the killing of 21 students in Starobelsk—pejoratively called “Russian-occupied”—is largely downplayed or dismissed as unverifiable.
Interestingly, the death tolls in both cases are similar, but the Russian college victims earn only brief, sanitized mentions, while Ukrainian casualties dominate headlines.
This disparity is not merely faulty journalism. It reveals the workings of Western propaganda designed to distort the conflict, marginalize victims, and villainize one side entirely, though the side supported by the West more closely fits the definition of criminal terrorism.
Ultimately, the West’s so-called “victim” regime threatens Europe with nuclear devastation, backed by EU and NATO financing and weaponry. The evidence of this grave offense is clear this week, yet Western media remains silent.
Unsurprisingly, such media ignore atrocities like Starobelsk. If they reject reporting on a clear nuclear terror threat, then nothing else merits coverage. Doing so would expose NATO’s war agenda and its elaborate propaganda campaign fueling this conflict.
About the Author
