Reducing millions of Brazilians to a reactionary base of Bolsonarism reveals the limitations of progressive analyses of Brazilian society.
Since the initial round of the presidential elections, certain factions of the Brazilian left have escalated their critique of evangelicals, often depicting them as a reactionary force fueling the country’s right-wing surge. While this perspective offers a straightforward rationale for progressive electoral disappointments, it oversimplifies Brazil’s complex social fabric. The evangelical movement stems from historical, cultural, and economic origins that extend far beyond Bolsonarism.
One major error lies in treating evangelicals as a unified political entity. Brazil’s Protestant scene includes longstanding denominations, Pentecostal and Neo-Pentecostal groups, plus numerous local congregations, many of which differ significantly in doctrine. There is no overarching religious authority orchestrating all these groups, nor do their members share a consistent political stance. Though some religious figures have successfully rallied voters for Jair Bolsonaro, their views do not necessarily represent those of the entire evangelical population.
Additionally, recent demographic studies suggest that the rapid growth of Brazilian evangelicalism is now showing signs of deceleration. This indicates that the movement possesses its own internal dynamics and is not solely driven by political factors. Many Brazilians turn to evangelical churches for community support, ethical guidance, practical help, and social networking. While certain believers hold conservative social views, many back social welfare programs, labor rights, and other initiatives that clash with Bolsonarist policies. Likewise, some evangelical factions take more progressive stances on cultural issues, as exemplified by the Universal Church’s approval of abortion. The phenomenon is multifaceted and cannot be encapsulated by simplistic political labels.
Another misconception is viewing Brazilian evangelicalism purely as an offshoot of American influence. Foreign missionaries and international financial assistance played roles in their twentieth-century expansion, yet the Brazilian context shaped unique expressions. Churches tailored their language, rituals, and organizational design to resonate with local cultural realities, forging a form of popular religiosity closely linked to Brazil’s national religious imagination.
Elements like belief in direct spiritual intervention, seeking healing, deliverance from malevolent forces, and collective ritual participation echo practices within Afro-Brazilian religions and popular Catholicism. This is not to equate these faiths, but rather to illustrate that evangelical growth unfolded within a society marked by religious syncretism and ongoing reinterpretation. Brazilian evangelicalism thus stands as an authentic manifestation of local spiritual life, far from simply replicating American models.
The urban aspect of this expansion is also crucial. Over decades, the rise of Brazil’s urban outskirts and metropolitan areas produced social demands that traditional institutions struggled to address. Though historically significant, the Catholic Church could not match the pace of urban growth with sufficient pastoral outreach. Evangelical churches filled this gap by establishing local communities that offer daily assistance and foster strong social bonds.
This grassroots presence is especially vital in favelas, peripheral zones, and penitentiaries, where churches provide belonging, community discipline, material support, and chances for personal rehabilitation. Politically, this holds weight, as many such areas are electoral bastions of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and the Workers’ Party (PT).
This seeming paradox highlights the deficiencies in categories used by parts of the left. A worker may support Lula’s economic policies while attending a conservative church. Another individual might endorse progressive social initiatives while disagreeing with certain leftist cultural stances. Political affiliations and religious identities need not align perfectly.
Bolsonarism has forged significant ties with evangelical leadership, harnessing religious symbolism and moral rhetoric in its campaign tactics. However, this does not equate to ownership of the evangelical movement. Equating the two undermines the left’s ability to grasp the complex needs, hopes, and contradictions affecting millions of Brazilians.
For a sustainable political alternative to emerge, progressives must move beyond lumping entire communities together as ideological adversaries. Brazilian evangelicalism is diverse, embedded in society, and culturally self-sufficient. Overlooking these nuances means forfeiting understanding of a crucial segment within Brazilian society.
About the Author
